PDA

View Full Version : Fruit: The Most Misunderstood Food, PART 2



Sharon in Colorado
12-15-2005, 01:08 PM
This is the 2nd part from a e-newsletter I receive.

-------------

Fruit: The Most Misunderstood Food, PART 2

by Dr. Douglas Graham
www.foodnsport.com

Is fruit a snack, a dessert, a meal, or to be avoided entirely?

“I get so hungry when I eat only fruit.”

One of the most common complaints related to fruit is the idea that fruit's satiating power is not lasting. “I tried that 'fruit in the morning' thing and about an hour later I was starving,” is about the way the story usually goes.

At first glance, this may look like a valid indictment of fruit's inadequacy as a meal, but the situation deserves a bit more investigation. When I ask the nature of the fruit meal, I am usually told, “I had an orange,” or, “a slice of melon,” “ a banana” or “some grapes.”

For most people, a typical breakfast usually contains close to 750 calories. A medium sized piece of fruit averages about 75 calories. When we eat a breakfast of just “a piece of fruit or two,” we are eating only 10-20% of the calories that we previously did, thus we feel empty and low on energy.

Even if the goal is weight loss, this is too extreme a reduction to be satiating, maintainable, or nutritionally adequate. When explaining that fruit has a lower caloric density than all other foods except for vegetables and, therefore, fruit must be eaten in greater volume if one endeavors to consume sufficient calories, there is sometimes a glimmer of comprehension before the curtain of dismissal falls again.

“Yeah, but how much fruit can I eat at one sitting? You're telling me to eat more than one slice of a melon or two bananas?” “Yes,” I say. We can train ourselves to comfortably eat satisfying fruit meals, allowing ourselves to actually eat fruit until completely satiated. this could mean that you eat an entire melon for breakfast or six, twelve, or even a greater number of bananas for lunch. There are three main factors involved in feeling satiated, and here is how fruit figures in each.

It is very likely that as a child you heard your mom say, “Don't eat sweets before your meal, it will spoil your appetite.” In effect she was explaining that fruits are a satiating food, although she may have been speaking of candy or other less acceptable foods at the time.

Even a small rise in blood sugar to the above-normal range results in a satiated feeling. Fruit certainly supplies the necessary sugars for such a rise and, hence, is very satiating. This is why many people are initially satisfied to eat just a small amount of fruit.

Another reason why fruit eating results in satiation is their high content of essential nutrients. The nutritional composition of fruit comes closer to mimicking the full spectrum of human nutrient needs than that of any other food group.

Also, the nutrients in fruit are the most easily accessed and absorbed, as fruit requires less digestion than do other foods. Many of the nutrients in fruit require no digestion at all-they are readily absorbed. These include, but are not limited to: water, sugar, minerals, vitamins and many phytonutrients.

Although not digestible, the fiber in fruit is soft and soluble and thus gentle on the delicate membranes of the digestive tract while affording relatively easy access to the nutrients it encapsulates. These factors combine to make fruit the most satiating of foods.

Last but not least, our level of satiation is directly related to the volume of food we consume. As such, in order to feel satiated, we must ingest a significant volume of food. All of our essential nutrients can be concentrated into a tablet or cube and consumed in just a few bites.

While some experts may consider such a concentrated “meal” to be nutritionally complete, research has repeatedly shown that people are not satisfactorily satiated because of the meager volume. Exactly because of its low caloric densitY, fruit perfectly supplies satiating volumes of food per meal.

In fact, for many people who have become accustomed to the commonly consumed low-volume, fat-rich meals, deriving satisfaction from a meal of all fruit at first typically poses a seemingly insurmountable volume challenge. “My stomach can't hold all of that!” people believe.

Yet, if they take the challenge and stick with it for a few days, they will learn they can eat sufficient quantities and they will feel satisfied and reap the benefits of improved health.

Fruit makes the ideal meal

It takes a bit of practice to learn how much fruit is sufficient for a meal which will satiate for several hours until the next meal. It is equally true that a mental adjustment is required in order to expand one's understanding of how much fruit is actually appropriate at a meal.

With sufficient experience, one's ability to consume extremely satisfying fruit meals will grow to become one of life's great pleasures. After all, fruit is health food. Anyone interested in attaining, maintaining, and gaining increased health should consider consuming fruit as their predominant food.

ladybug
12-15-2005, 01:20 PM
I have been doing raw and just got to the chapter about food combo. Well in the morning, sipping at work from 10am til 1:30 pm, I have been making a smoothee of about 1 cup strawberries, 1 banana, 2 clemtines, 1 cup grapes, sometimes a kiwi and 2 scoops of hemp protein powder and 3 tbs muselix, (both from Alissa's store). This has held me over until about 3p.m. Before this smoothie I have a drink of spinach/carrott/spriula flakes around 7:00 am. Now having read combo chart it looks like I shouldn't be making this type of smoothie. So now I will try to simplify and hope it fills me. Yesterday was the first morning I had carrott/raisin bread with almond butter on top, OH MY G-D SUPER YUMMY however I was very hungry early afternoon. What was up with that?????

tglasco4
12-15-2005, 01:23 PM
Well done Sharon!

Fruitarianone
12-15-2005, 05:51 PM
Thank you so much Sharon.

Tombi
12-15-2005, 07:11 PM
Thanks Sharon I really needed that!! :)

JMD
12-16-2005, 08:04 AM
hI,

I believe that is from Fredrick Patenaude (sp?) newsletter that comes out on Thursday. It IS great information....however IMO he has changed to be more money/profit focused and I have lost some respect for him. I cannot get into his newletters anymore because all it is is a commercial to buy his things versus give information. It is too bad because he is very bright.

Sharon in Colorado
12-16-2005, 09:39 AM
JMD I mainly read the newsletters. He does have a ton of free info.

Understand that like many out there making money with what they love to do, he makes his living off what he believes in. However his advertising is probably what puts many people off. I think if Alissa or Dr. Graham or Raw Guru used these techniques they may turn people off as well. So I completely understand where you are coming from.

Dr. Graham has a lot of free articles at his website, www.doctorgraham.cc - I've printed them out and passed them around at raw support group meetings.

JMD
12-16-2005, 10:02 AM
Sharon,

I TOTALLY understand one needs to make a living. BUT!! Fredrick sent an email that he will "not return from his vacation in Bali unless he gets his dream scuba trip" . It then said he needs us to purchase his products to raise money so he can take the scuba trip or he will never return to Canada! That is like raw-evangelism to me. There is a more tactful way to behave. I was totally disappointed in him.

I also read Dr G.'s info. It is easier to read and get to than Fredrick's. To me Gabriel Cousins is a doll. He really is looking into the spirit and soul of people. This is why I AM RAW--to enhance my spiritual health as well as physical.

ReneeSC
12-16-2005, 02:33 PM
That is like raw-evangelism to me. There is a more tactful way to behave. I was totally disappointed in him.

I had to think pretty hard to understand what you were meaning by "raw evengelism" as it relates to FP's asking for product monies so he can take his trip.

What you meant and what some of us feel is "raw evengelism" are so different. Those of us (the opposites of tele-evangelists who make the rest of us look stupid ) who tell anything to anyone do so without asking for a thing, and get a real kick out of other peoples' true interests in what we're trying to show them.

Not knowing FP, and only briefly being introduced to his views and philosophies, I can only comment on what I see. Perceptions being what they are - looking through a glass darkly - sometimes those who write newsletters, create seminars, write books, sell products, and are generally out in the public with their "schtick" ( word meant in a good way, if possible ), sometimes may have a false sense of intimacy with their "followers", and therefore might not be disueded from saying things that in the general populace would be considered scandelous business practices.
Let's say that was the case with FP's asking for his Bali dream trip - innocent banter between people he considers "good friends" and comrades.

The alternative swing-shot would be that he's a fleecer of the public and using this wagon to cart him all over the world, and doing so with narcissitic malice. Not being in his brain or heart I can't judge him.

I will say, though, that it really bothers me when those who "teach" raw claim they have the "True Secrets to Raw" or "How not to become Sick on Raw".. scaring people into thinking that if they don't know what they know, they're going to kill themselves...( you get the idea, I hope )... propelling you into purchasing their e-books or buying products. That just really frustrates me. I'm not singling out FP( he does offer a lot on the I-net) or any other person any one of us reads or studies. I will say this, though, I've NEVER seen Alissa do that. Yes, she's a business owner. But, she was a business owner WAY before Raw.

Take what works for _you_ and the rest can go into the circular file ( trash can). If FP tells you things that help your life, YAY! Or Doug Graham or Gabe Cousins or Rhio, Jingee - name any others you can think of, and if they resonate with you - RING ON.

sport
12-16-2005, 02:53 PM
I had received those messages but had deleted them without reading them simply because I was suspicious of the format. I have retreived them as a result of this post and read them. I think that it was a joke that missfired.

Sharon in Colorado
12-16-2005, 03:02 PM
I got a follow up e-mail after the Bali one from his assistant who aplogized for sending it out and saying it was meant to be taken as funny. She got a lot of heat for that letter, a lot of folks asked to be removed from the e-mail lists, while several others used all kinds of profanity.

I was put off by the e-mail as well, and did tell that to his assistant that sent them out.

LOL - I could think of things I don't care for about some other folks in the commercial raw circles, but, I'm not going to go there!

Anyway, I hope everyone who read this, at least enjoyed the article which was meant to inform, for free.

ReneeSC
12-16-2005, 03:27 PM
I got a follow up e-mail after the Bali one from his assistant who aplogized for sending it out and saying it was meant to be taken as funny. She got a lot of heat for that letter, a lot of folks asked to be removed from the e-mail lists, while several others used all kinds of profanity.

Good, Sharon. I'm glad it was my first thought.

Ditto on what you said about some "teachers". :) You'd know a whole lot more about it than I.

Article: GOOD!

Raw_Medic
12-16-2005, 03:52 PM
Sharon,
To get back on topic, thank you for posting that...I don't typically get newsletters because I get too busy to read them and they sit in my inbox, plus I always know that the article is good if someone here posts one.

This is great information and reminds me to eat more fruit in the morning so I'm not getting hungry an hour or two later! thanks!

Ursula

JMD
12-16-2005, 05:35 PM
I am so glad that it was a joke..things ususally do not bug me but IF it was true...I woulda been bummed. PHEW!

Doe
12-16-2005, 10:16 PM
Sharon, thank you so much for posting this! Where can we read the 1st part?

Teri S