View Full Version : My turn to ask a silly question!
Rawkinlocs
10-03-2004, 02:51 PM
Okay, so we all (or mostly all) feel as though cooking foods beyond a certain temperature destroys the nutrients, destroys the enzymes and if there ARE any nutrients left in the food, they are not easily assimilated by our bodies... is this correct?
Okay, if so, then please tell me why we always feel that leaving a cooked food diet and going for a raw food diet means we are now more suseptible of being deficient?
I mean, what nutrients did the cooked food diet provide that are supposedly lost when we abandon said diet?
Is the reason for thinking that raw fooders (or even cooked vegetarians/vegans for that matter) are more prone to deficiency because we tend to eat LESS or is it because we are no longer eating (COOKED) meat and dairy products?
Somebody help me out here because this is really daunting to keep hearing about raw fooders feeling the need to take this supplement or that powder to supplement something that supposedly was never there to begin with (assuming the whole "cooked food is void of nutrients/cooked food is poison" theory is true).
Thanks
P.S. Please know that I am not trying to offend anyone or put down those members who are currently taking supplements or protein powders. I am merely asking this question for my own knowledge and clarity based on the things I mentioned above.
tglasco4
10-03-2004, 03:42 PM
I hear ya Sis,
I don't believe I need ANYTHING other than the food itself. Fruit, veggies, nuts and seeds. Plenty of fresh water. Sunshine and clean air. Lots of Faith. No supplements (I just recently stopped taking them), no powders or anything else for me. The only folks I know that preach about a body needing supplements or dairy or meat are either (1) Representing one of those industries for profit, (2) Has fear as a result of the tremendous marketing campaign for (1) or (3) means well and is just ignorant to the truth. What we were given as a diet originally is still the best diet. It does take time to let the body adjust to being fed poison for decades, which is why many never hang around long enough or are patient enough to find out. I have only been doing mostly raw for 5 months and although I have had tremendous results in terms of health, I expect my body to continue adjusting for the next couple of years. One day I will crave all raw and my body will reject any cooked food and that will come as naturally as the change of seasons.
Peace.
Todd
Okay, so we all (or mostly all) feel as though cooking foods beyond a certain temperature destroys the nutrients, destroys the enzymes and if there ARE any nutrients left in the food, they are not easily assimilated by our bodies... is this correct?
Okay, if so, then please tell me why we always feel that leaving a cooked food diet and going for a raw food diet means we are now more suseptible of being deficient?
I mean, what nutrients did the cooked food diet provide that are supposedly lost when we abandon said diet?
Is the reason for thinking that raw fooders (or even cooked vegetarians/vegans for that matter) are more prone to deficiency because we tend to eat LESS or is it because we are no longer eating (COOKED) meat and dairy products?
Somebody help me out here because this is really daunting to keep hearing about raw fooders feeling the need to take this supplement or that powder to supplement something that supposedly was never there to begin with (assuming the whole "cooked food is void of nutrients/cooked food is poison" theory is true).
Thanks
Rawkinlocs
10-03-2004, 03:58 PM
Thanks Todd!
nobletroll
10-03-2004, 04:22 PM
Quick answer we are brained washed.
During the middle ages it was thought that taking a bath often could cause one to be ill and drinking water was not healthy. Both ideals had some bases in fact, water born illness due to human waste being dumped into the same water they drank and bathed in could cause illness, but those acts did not cause illness. Eating uncooked meat can make you sick from the parasites and diseases they carry. When animal waste is put on plants without composting (this is not aloud for organic foods) organisms from that waste can be harmful. The problem is not eating the food raw. The solution is not in cooking the food to kill the bad organisms it is farming the right way, which is what most organic farmers do. If an organic farmer dos not farm the right way he has crop problems and doesn't make money. If a factory farmer doesn't farm in the correct way he sprays his crop with pesticides that jest make the bad organisms stronger.
People are looking for reasons to keep eating cooked food. ItÂ’s like the addict making up reasons to keep using. There are toxins made in cooking foods, and I believe we are addicted to those toxins. The reason you are getting are jest excuses to justify that addiction.
mwjeepster
10-03-2004, 05:19 PM
Like your name ;) ! I tend to agree, that if in fact whole raw foods have everything we need, then we don't need supplements - I think the need might arise with people like me who don't eat a good variety of foods - which is not to say we did so when we were eating cooked, but we're not going for a little bit of better health here, we're going for over-the-top, blow your brains out fabulous health - the kind of health that very few of us have probably ever experienced. So while I'm drinking a green drink every day, and trying to mix up different greens in the process, there are certain veggies you will not find me in the same room with :( therefore, I may be a good candidate for shapeshift, etc. because I really would like the benefit of really being in great health. Oh, and Noble, I believe in the times you are referring to, the earth was considered flat!!! :D
Love to all,
Melissa
ehartmanf
10-03-2004, 05:52 PM
What a great discussion. I try to get a good variety of fruits and vegetables, but I always did, even when I was eating cooked. I'm always looked for new and different things I've never had before. Right now I'm searching for persimmons. Can't find them here yet.
Today I juiced carrots, apple, celery, beet and collard greens together. It tasted amazing and was so energizing. I don't think I need any supplements to help me achieve and maintain good health, but they probably wouldn't hurt either.
I've been thinking about trying a little hemp protein in my smoothies.....
Rawkinlocs
10-03-2004, 07:37 PM
Thanks for your replies thus far all!
I guess what I'm trying to understand is the thinking I've found from some raw fooders on various sites that seems to imply that by no longer eating a cooked food diet, we are now missing out on something by eating all raw foods.
I'm wondering how this is possible IF the nutrients in cooked foods are allegedly null and void, meaning, we must have already BEEN deficient on the S.A.D. (or standard cooked diet for those who are not IN America! ;) ) and that now that we're eating these live foods we should be getting what we need.
Also, one other question: The statement, "Our soil is depleted"...is that even really true, or is that another ploy of the "big guys" to make sure we spend money on various vitamins such as One A Day or Centrum, etc.? This is a retorical question...I'm just giving some food for thought here. As I heard it said one day, if our soil was THAT depleted, then the fruits and veggies wouldn't even grow and/or survive.
monkeyboy
10-03-2004, 11:40 PM
Rawkinlocs,
I hear you loud and clear.
"Raw fooders don't get enough nutrients"...... "Thier diets are limited". We hear this all the time.
Let's face it, a guy who eats cooked food has limits to his diet too. Bacon and eggs for breakfast, cheeseburger and fries for lunch, and pasta with cream sauce for dinner, all washed down with a few beers.
Give me the nutritional facts on that diet.
The brainwashing must stop.
Raw foods is the way to go. Eat as much a variety as you can. How can you loose going raw. You still need to think about what you are eating, but it's much better than cooked food guy.
Peace and Knife safety,
M.B.
marigold
10-04-2004, 02:02 AM
i certainly dont believe that on raw we are getting less than on cooked..i think we get more!! but something isnt right that lots on raw are getting ill and deficent - dont know why - not eating a balanced diet ? but its not something imo that we can ignore...
i dont beleive we can get all we need from any way of eating.- cos yeah the soil is crap these days..how can we ? and of cours there is the b12 issue too...
i take some superfoods and i have to say the day i did that i felt so much better..i look on superfoods as an insurance policy..it covers me for the times i cant face my greens for example or when i dont eat as well as i could..ok not ideal but them we dont live in an ideal world do we ?
The debates on other raw food boards that I have seen about deficiencies in raw eating have been around b-12 and calcium/magnesium. Sometimes the debates get rather heated!. And there seems to be an equal amount of debate between those who see it as an issue to those who say it's an non-issue.
I think the soil errosion issue is true - raw food is not as full of nutrients as it once was. And most of the raw foods we eat are hybrids - I don't think there is any original raw food left (a sad thought...). I've heard there may be some original apples left - but likely not available to consumers.
As to supplements - I think they may be useful when your transitioning to raw or if you are ill. But I don't think someone should become dependent on them or use them as a meal replacement.
There's some people on raw food boards that are really into micro-managing their diet. They measure and map out every possible nutrient in every bite of food. And some try to analysis other's diets and announce they are "potassium" deficient or have some other deficiency. *Yawn*
I expect it won't be long before mainstream (S.A.D.) nutritionists denounce the raw food diet as nutritionally unsound (maybe they already have...?)
Jeanne
10-04-2004, 09:50 AM
I've been thinking about your question. One of the things that people (including myself) might make people think 'deficiencies' is symptoms. In the past with the SAD and other 'diets' people get symptoms and then they _take_ something to get rid of them. I am reading the book, The Detox Miracle Sourcebook by Rober Norse N.D.
He really has brought my thinking around to what typical western medicine overlooks and misinterperets as symptoms. In the standard approach the view is, when a symptom occurs, something is taken and then when the symptom disappears, health is resumed. In the Detox Miracle a symptom is a sign of the body working to cope or eliminate some overload or imbalance and the general perscription is to do nothing, let the temperature burn the offender out, let the mucous drain.
When people start raw foods, detox starts, and symptoms of detox appear and people often think something is wrong.
Also, the body seems to start absorbing so much better that when a dietary discretion happens, there are often quick results of discomfort of one kind or another. The body can't handle the 'wide path' of, "Oh, just for tonight, I'll go back to my healthier eating tomorrow."
I have had some things pop up that I have had to wonder which it is, lack or detox. Before raw I had a host of symptoms that all pointed to lack. The Detox Miracle book is helping me identify what system was (and still is in some cases) deficient and why, but the cure is always the same....raw foods... especially fruit for it's cleansing properties. So patience has replaced fear, and I am being good to myself (as of last week) giving myself the rest I need when episodes of detox appear. I am listening to myself more closely too and not pushing past subtle messages with my standard-operating-procedure lifestyle I used to think nothing twice about.
I will say that there are certain symptoms that occur that do signal something needed, like cracks at the corners of the mouth indicate more greens. This happened to me and one large meal of greens and the next day the cracks were gone.
The past few days I am following the 80-10-10 (80% fruit-10%veg, 10% fat) appraoch. This has made it easy for me to make sure I am getting all I need. I am feeling very good and balanced on this. I am able to really intuit what my body needs. I know there was a thread about the impossibility of staying on this for any length of time, but the key is in quantity of food, people don't realize that the amount is key to success. I have been counting the calories while I adjust to this, and left to my own, typical choices I would be eating around 700 calories a day. Other's have noticed this too. So no wonder after a while people would feel drained! I am doubling my menu now, don't need to count the calories anymore.
I do expect odd symptoms of detox to pop now. I have read that the body exhibits symptoms of past ailments as those things that caused the issue are passing through on the way out. So I won't be shocked and wonder what to do to stop it. Depending on what it is I may rest more and/or take just juices or maybe a water fast to give the body the focus to do what it has to do without having to digest as well.
Thanks for starting such a great thread!!
Rawkinlocs
10-04-2004, 10:08 AM
Thanks again everyone. I am really enjoying reading your responses to my question(s)! Jeanne, I REALLY appreciate you sharing what you've learned in that book...I must get it!
See, this is what I'm talking about, precisely what you said...that when we switch from cooked (and/or the SAD) that we experience discomforts of detox and where we used to believe that we must take something or go running to the doctor, patience and continuing on the path will make all better.
This is why I got SO frustrated reading a certain article that said detox shouldn't last more than a few months. How on God's green earth can we expect to have abused our bodies and eaten crap most/all of our lives and then the detox is supposed to only last a short while. We spent YEARS putting all this garbage in, so it should be expected to take a while to get it all out of our systems. This is just my take on it...again, I'm not a professional...it just seems like common sense to me. <=== That was just me ranting, btw.
Again, thanks for all replies!
One more quick question for anyone who cares to answer!
Okay, so if our soil is depleted and the fruits and veggies we consume don't have all that they once had in them...where do the vitamins, nutrients, minerals, etc. in SUPPLEMENTS come from? Where are they derived from?
I've asked this before (not sure if it was here or where it was...can't remember). Thanks!
marigold
10-04-2004, 10:33 AM
good question rawkins..there is a difference between supplements and superfoods though isnt there ? guess superfoods just have more powerful nutrients in than say an apple.
what you say makes sence bout detoxing taking so long but them i know people have been ill for years or months and going oh its detox when in fact its not..
this oh detox this and that and raw is so wonderful worries me really - i feel we need the balance rather than the raw food MOVEMENT..where i see a lot of scarey behavour..illness and deficiancy being ignored..and wimmin with almost like eating disorders "trying to keep raw"
now who is having a rant!!! i think raw is great and we need balance.
Rawkinlocs
10-04-2004, 11:01 AM
good question rawkins..there is a difference between supplements and superfoods though isnt there ? guess superfoods just have more powerful nutrients in than say an apple.
what you say makes sence bout detoxing taking so long but them i know people have been ill for years or months and going oh its detox when in fact its not..
this oh detox this and that and raw is so wonderful worries me really - i feel we need the balance rather than the raw food MOVEMENT..where i see a lot of scarey behavour..illness and deficiancy being ignored..and wimmin with almost like eating disorders "trying to keep raw"
now who is having a rant!!! i think raw is great and we need balance.
Hiya Marigold! Thanks for your reply and I do really understand what you are saying. But again, the question comes to mind, where is the "deficiency" stemming from? Is it because they are not eating enough? Not eating a variety of different things (eating all fruit and no veggies or all nuts and no fruit or all veggies and no nuts?). How can one NOT be classified as deficient when they were on the cooked food diet and now all of a sudden after being on a raw food diet, they're deficient?
Also, I think that many of us still have the wrong idea about what disease and illness is and what causes it. I've read in Shelly Keck-Borsit's book "Dying to Get Well" (located at http://dyingtogetwell.com) that there is ONE cause for disease - autointoxication (or plainly put, the body self-poisoning itself due to toxins that it can't eliminate properly) and that there is ONE cure for disease - getting the toxins out of the body...cleaning it on the inside...eliminating the cause of the toxins (food, environment, etc.).
If you haven't already, please read this (very lengthy) article and tell me what you think. http://www.neohygiene.com/excerpt.html
If raw fooders are no longer putting toxic-producing foods into their bodies, then their "illness" has to be either detox or (in "some" cases if they're not eating the RIGHT kinds/variations of raw food) deficiency.
And again, even with superfoods...where does this stuff COME from? Who's producing it? HOW are they producing it and what is the source?
Sea vegetation? Why can't we just include kelp or dulse or nori into our diets then? I do. B12 supplements? B12 has something to do with "good" bacteria, right? I say that because sometimes I use nutrional yeast flakes and it's said that it's an excellent source of B12 and that this nutritional yeast is grown from bacteria on a certain type of molasses. I've read that our own bodies produce and recycle B12 (I guess a healthy body, that is).
I'm not arguing with you by any means Marigold...in fact, this post isn't directly only to you, but to anyone reading because these are things that I think should be taken into consideration.
Allow me to give this example and I'm gonna shut up for a while 'cause I tend to get "long-winded" at times!:o
When I was eating the SAD (or standard cooked food diet), I was diagnosed as being anemic. I was ALWAYS tired and lethargic with no energy whatsoever. I had to take naps and was always cold.
Now, doctors had me taking iron supplements (which made me sick) to combat the problem.
Since having gone (high) raw, I have noticed that I no longer need naps (unless I stay up too late the night before and get up early as I normally do!), I'm not cold anymore and I just feel better than I EVER felt taking those supplements.
So the point of my little story? That what was considered a deficiency and prescribed supplements only needed a change in my diet and my body to be cleaned out.
I think that this will ever be a debatable subject, but it's nice to hear the differing views. In the end, we all have to listen to our own bodies and follow our own paths! :D
elwaytaffy
10-04-2004, 11:39 AM
Here is my silly question...I keep hearing about 'superfoods'. What exactly are superfoods? Thanks!
ConsciousCuisine
10-04-2004, 12:15 PM
When people refer to "Superfoods" they are often talking about Blue-Green Algae, Red Sea Weed, Barley Grass, Wheat Grass, Alfalfa Leaf Powder, Spirulina, Chlorella, Beet Concentrate, Dulse and other nutrient-dense foods.
Maitake, Shitake and Reishi Mushrooms are also considered "Superfoods".
Some consider fermented foods such as cultured veggies and kefir and kim chee to be "Superfoods".
Dr. Schulze makes a formula of pure, whole foods called "Superfood" and it is all Raw except for the Nutritional Yeast which is "Live". It's the one I retail to my clients, with a few ingredients that I supplement it with to create a custom blend. It is really affordable when compared to some of the others and all organic and wildcrafted.
Rawkinlocs,
I can tell that you are very well read and have given health and nutrition considerable thought. What I can contribute to this discussion will probably not shed any new light but I can share some of my "beliefs". Here"s my 2 cents.
1. I believe raw foods alone (without the use of suppliments) can provide the necessary nutrients to maintain the health of the body, but it is important to eat a variety of differant foods to insure that we get everything we need.
2. I believe there are many factors involved in inhibiting our nutritional intake such as;
foods grown in poor or "dead" soil.
overly hybridized foods.
irradiated foods.
genetically altered foods.
improper food combining.
improper food preperation (such as not soaking seeds)
our internal environment (such as impacted intestinal walls)
3. On the other hand, I believe that suppliments can have their place in providing nutrition when one can get it no other way (but they cannot be totally trusted.)
4. I believe that the sole purpose of bacteria is to break down dead and dying tissue. They are attracted by disease, they don't cause it.
5. I believe that the body is a self-healing organism and if we provide it with the proper materials it will correct itself.
6. I believe that we have been under-educated, misinformed, and mislead by the AMA and the FDA for the sake of profit.
Well thats my 2 cents. And Rawkinlocs, if you haven't already seen the link that I posted for Curtis, here it is again. http://www.whale.to/v/disease3.html You may enjoy reading it.
kirk
Rawkinlocs
10-04-2004, 01:16 PM
Hey Kirk! You summed that up pretty darn well buddy!! :D (OH, and thanks for the "well-learned" comment...I'm trying!)
I agree with you and I can totally understand the instances you listed for one possibly needing to supplement their diet (i.e. the crap soil, not soaking/sprouting, etc.) and that makes sense (as has everything everyone else said). I guess I just get leary about too much hype being placed on things such as superfoods and supplements. I mean, as you stated...can we always trust them? I fear that there will come a time when we won't be able to determine WHO to trust even with raw foods and superfoods/supplements because of all this genetically modified stuff and the talk (or perhaps the reality) of even ORGANIC growers succombing to the pressure to use GMO-based seeds or the possibility of genetically modified seeds getting mixed up with organic and just making NOTHING pure anymore!
I guess that is where my faith will have to help me as I do the best I can to eat the best I can.
Sharon
10-04-2004, 01:38 PM
Hi Rawkin! Thanks for getting this thread started. I think I know exactly what you meant in your original question. (At least part of it) If I start to feel a little off, say tired or weak, I start to think, well, if I were eating cooked food would I feel this way? Then I continue thinking and I wonder: How can I blame it on raw food? What is it exactly that my previous cooked diet had that my raw diet doesn't? Nothing, except more fat, more cooked crap ..... Anyway, my raw diet has to be LEAGUES ahead of my cooked diet, which, incidentally, was very good for cooked. I still ate a ton of fruit and veggies, and was a longtime vegetarian. So where am I going with this? I don't know!!!LOL :p Except that when I really stop to think about it, my body is transitioning (raw for only about 4 months) and so I can expect to feel "funny" sometimes, but that doesn't make raw food bad. Now I'm starting to feel like I'm rambling here. Anyhew, as for the supplement part, I do worry about the B12 thing, and so I do supplement with that. Also, we don't always know how well we're absorbing certain nutrients, etc., so I guess I look at supplements (I"m considering the raw hemp protein as well) as insurance, as someone else said above. Just my two cents! But great post. Thanks for all the responses everyone, great input! :)
For those of us who would prefer that the government not fiddle with our food supply, here is one possible solution.
http://www.heirloomseeds.com/
Although hybridization has been going on since the 1800's, these seeds have been preserved from further manipulation.
kirk
Jeanne
10-04-2004, 02:25 PM
In the miracle Detox book he recommends adding some of the green superfoods , bee pollen, alfalfa etc. if people are concerned about depletion of soils.
I think that people's body's adapt as best they can when being abused or not fed enough of the right stuff. Like, if a person's thyroid and adrenals are weak and the body can't utilize calcium properly, then the bones give up some of their calcium. This just happens, we don't necessarily feel it right away but eventually the effects will be known. People will take heart medication for arythmia (due to the adrenal/thyroid issue but the root reason is never delt with. Again, relief of symptoms is sought and a clean bill of health is given when symptoms stop manifesting.
Colds and flus happen so the body can detox and we try and get over it as quickly as possible, like some foreign invader has inflicted itself upon us, we don't like waiting things out. We want whatever it is that spells R-E-L-I-E-F.
The body can adapt to and handle just so much and eventually worse than flu things start happening. Evidence of chronic degeneration happens..(and is happening at younger and younger ages). This is still seen as out of our control.
When we go raw, and we get cleared out of a lot of old stuff, we become more sensitive to things that once upon a time might not have caused a ripple. We were too dense before. The body just took on one more assault to cope with. All these lack of symptoms often went along with a minimum of energy, clarity of mind...needing that double espresso to uncross the eyes in the morning. We shot up with caffein and sugar and then as the big low was upon us we'd get another shot of something with a double cheese burger..what felt like energy was just the body kicking into overdrive to try and deal with the loadful that was just dumped in it, sort of like discovering your house is on fire and you suddenly have the energy of an army top deal with the emerrgency. Eventually something's gonna go.
So now here we are taking two days trying to get over a mini splurge with some friends which makes us look weak and like we're on the wrong track. But think about it, the body is so clear now that these supposed small indescretions are really fully felt assaults, there's no buffer zone. It's probably like someone who doesn't smoke having a cigarette.
Defiency can only come from not eating enough. Just for the heck of it, go to fitday.com and add up everything you are eating in the course of a day. It is surprising how much raw fooders can eat to reach even 1000 calories!
I still think a detox symptom is sometimes thought of as deficiency. Our culture doesn't even have this as something we learn about. All symptoms are bad and must be stopped asap. One girl who's hair was falling out stopped it by eating an egg a day. To me, she was detoxing and stopped the process. But to her, she was relieved and felt like she needs the protein in that egg.
marigold
10-05-2004, 05:02 AM
and rakins i am no disagreeing with you either ;) i kinda agree with all you say and i agree with the other side of it too..is this possible !! the bottom line is as you say how can we be worse off on raw ?
love marigold
The role of traditional medicine is to treat symptoms (largely promoted and backed by pharmacuetical companies). That's why many people end up on numerous drugs - because the physician is only trained to treat the individual symptoms, not a cause. They also don't recieve any training in nutrition - at least on how nutrition relates to disease (that's a non-existant factor to traditional doctor's). So it is sad - that many of the diseases that are taking over our health care system are treatable (and preventable) by diet.
I think some diseases can be avoided (treated?) by eliminating toxins - but I also think it's dependent on the type of disease the the progression of the disease. Some diseases are seen as genetically based - but what's sad is some people with those disease just give up: "oh, there's nothing I can do because it's genetic...".
Was it David Wolfe who wrote about eating (100%) raw, that it takes one month for every year you ate cooked food, to heal/eliminate toxins?. So if you are 40 and ate cooked food all of your 40 years, it would take 40 months of 100% raw to detox.
Kristi
10-06-2004, 07:19 AM
My husband is on high blood pressure meds. He had a work physical and the doc said the blood pressure was high for being on medicine. So, he went back to our family doctor. The doc increased his medicine. I said, "what else did he say?" Nothing was the reply. I said, "nothing?!" "didn't he ask about your diet, your smoking or your drinking????? He just gave you a bandaid and you accepted that!" "Shame on both of you!" It's made me very sad. I am afraid he is going to die very early. I think that I HAVE to stay raw so there is a parent that is alive for our kids. It just scares me and makes me so sad. I don't know how to get through to him. I know I can't change him.
Rawkinlocs
10-06-2004, 08:50 AM
My husband is on high blood pressure meds. He had a work physical and the doc said the blood pressure was high for being on medicine. So, he went back to our family doctor. The doc increased his medicine. I said, "what else did he say?" Nothing was the reply. I said, "nothing?!" "didn't he ask about your diet, your smoking or your drinking????? He just gave you a bandaid and you accepted that!" "Shame on both of you!" It's made me very sad. I am afraid he is going to die very early. I think that I HAVE to stay raw so there is a parent that is alive for our kids. It just scares me and makes me so sad. I don't know how to get through to him. I know I can't change him.
Wow Kristi (((hugs))), I know that must be hard. And I know how family and close friends can be so stubborn but realize he's blinded and not ready to see. Maybe one day, by you being a loving example as much as you can, he will "see the light". It's unfortunate because many people:
1. Accept any and EV-ER-Y thing the doctor says
2. Know in their hearts what is needed to do to change, but don't want to "deprive" themselves of life's "pleasures" or even cut back on them a little.
3. Many have the "Well, I gotta go some time...might as well go enjoying (fill in the blank)!"
4. See disease as inevitable...something that just happens and comes with old age or what have you and as long as they have health care to cover their doctor's visits and/or their prescriptions, they'll just pop ten-zillion pills daily.
Boy am I preaching to myself. Like you, I have to stick with this because I need to be preventative for myself, and I'd like to be an example to those around me who live by those four "rules of life" above!
Jeanne
10-06-2004, 10:49 AM
My husband was on blood pressure medicine since the early nineties. After a while one med would stop working and they would put him on another. Each medicine would have side effects. One was gout. So he had to take gout medicine. Another side effect was being unable to do excersise, even simply walking was too much.
He was willing to take all this into stride especially with both parents taking similar meds and reinforcing the "that's the way it is, it's genetic." approach. This never set well with me. for many obvious reasons, but the fact that his sister doesn't need any medication for anything was a big clue.
A year and a half ago the doctor ordered some tests. My husband had to travel 100 miles to find the right testing equipment for the right price. When it came time to see the doctor and review the tests, my husband sat there watching the man flip through the pages, skipping a few and grunting that everything looks good. He ordered the same tests a year later. My husband postponed them because of the expense, and becaue it was obvious that they were not really a concern to the doctor's caring for him. AND we were still paying for the first set of tests. We realized that doctors will order tests so that just in case something happens in the future, they've covered all their bases.
When we bumped into some old friends that talked about juicing etc. we were a few weeks away from the postponed tests. The thing is, if you don't go with the program, you can loose the doctor.
After two weeks of going raw, my husband was off medicine for the first time since he started it. His blury thinking was cleared up and all his energy was back. He is done with useless tests. But it took some things to happen to make him have to weigh his options. Having sub standard health insurance helped. Dr.s prescribe things assuming insurance will pay. Fees are based on insurance. At one place my husband actually bargained with them on the fee!
Raw got him off his meds, nothing else worked. He may or may not be a patient of this particular doctor. It doesn't matter.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.4 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.